Let's see how we can help you!
Leave a message and our dedicated advisor will contact you.
Send us a message
0/10000
Leave a message and our dedicated advisor will contact you.
The decision to implement a Security Operations Center (SOC) is no longer just a technical wish list item for the IT department. With the NIS2 directive coming into force, increasingly aggressive ransomware groups, and rising insurance requirements, Polish boards are facing a concrete dilemma: build their own team from scratch or trust an external partner (SOC as a Service)?
Let's face it – this is primarily a financial decision. It could cost your company millions of Złoty annually, or... allow you to save the lion's share of your security budget while simultaneously increasing your protection level.
In this article, we will break down the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of both models. Without sugarcoating, we will calculate how much it truly costs and reveal expenses that vendors often "forget" to mention over coffee.
Many IT managers, when sitting down with Excel to plan the budget (CAPEX), enter the price of SIEM licenses and the salaries of "three IT guys". Unfortunately, operational reality (OPEX) verifies these assumptions quite brutally. Especially when we realize what the 24/7/365 monitoring requirement – which is now standard for essential entities under NIS2 – actually entails.
This is where we most often make estimation errors. It seems that three people are enough for three shifts. Nothing could be further from the truth. To ensure continuity of monitoring on a single shift (e.g., Tier 1 support), you need a minimum of 5-6 full-time equivalents (FTEs).
Why so many? Because a week has 168 hours. Add to that vacations, sick leaves, training (a necessity in this industry, not a benefit), and life in general.
Real, market personnel costs (Warsaw, 2026 estimates):
Annual Total (Salaries alone): Well over 2 million PLN.
We must also remember retention. The average tenure of a SOC analyst in one place is barely 18-24 months. Professional burnout, or alert fatigue, is a real problem in this industry. When a specialist leaves, the cost of replacing them is often equivalent to six months of their salary – we lose time on recruitment, onboarding, and regaining full team efficiency.
People need tools to work with. And sure, "Open Source" is free, but only in theory. In practice, it requires massive engineering effort to maintain, integrate, and parse logs. On the other hand, commercial Enterprise-class solutions mean massive license invoices.
Technology changes daily. A team that doesn't train moves backward. Certifications like SANS, OSCP, or CISSP are an expense of at least 50,000 PLN annually for the team. Add to that hundreds of senior hours spent building and updating Playbooks so that procedures actually work, instead of just looking nice in a binder.
The SOCaaS model works a bit like cloud computing, but for security. The provider (MSSP) invests in top-tier technology, builds processes, and hires an army of experts, and these massive costs are spread across hundreds of clients.
Let's take the same organization that would spend over 2 million on its own staff:
Annual TCO of SOCaaS closes in the range of 300,000 - 800,000 PLN.
We are talking about savings in the range of 60-75%. This results from simple math: an analyst on the night shift at a provider monitors 20 companies simultaneously, not just one. Your risk is the same, but the cost is shared.
Let's analyze two scenarios for a typical Polish manufacturing company (500 employees, covered by NIS2 as an important entity).
The Board decides: "We want full control, we do it ourselves."
The Board decides: "We want results, not resources."
There are situations where In-House SOC is the best – or only – choice:
For many digitally mature companies, the best solution is the Hybrid SOC model, which combines the benefits of both worlds:
You pay a fraction of the full In-House price, protect your people from burnout (offloading monotony to the provider), but the "brain" of the operation remains inside the company.
Before you sign an invoice for millions of Złoty, ask yourself three simple questions:
Remember, regardless of the model: The most expensive SOC is the one that doesn't work when it's truly needed.
Every company is different. If you are wondering which model would be best for you, contact us. We can prepare a free TCO analysis for your organization, comparing the costs of building your own team with implementing SecurHUB Managed SOC service.
Yes. Professional providers (MSSPs) operate based on rigorous ISO 27001 standards and are audited more frequently than internal departments. Logs are usually sent via an encrypted channel, and access to them is strictly regulated. However, signing the appropriate agreement (SLA and NDA) is key.
Yes. The NIS2 directive does not impose an implementation model. It requires organizations to ensure effective monitoring, detection, and response. For many companies, outsourcing is actually the preferred path to quickly achieving compliance, as SOCaaS providers already have ready-made processes and technologies that meet regulatory requirements.
The biggest underestimated cost is employee turnover (HR). The cost of recruitment, onboarding, and lost knowledge when a senior leaves is enormous. Other hidden costs include: continuous training, maintaining server infrastructure for SIEM (storage, power, cooling), and time lost "fighting with tools" instead of analyzing threats.
In the SOCaaS model, you outsource the entire operation (24/7). In the Hybrid model, you share responsibility. The provider typically takes on the "heavy lifting" (frontline, nights, weekends), and your internal team focuses on strategy, security policies, and responding to the most critical incidents during business hours.
Building your own SOC from scratch is a process taking from 6 to 18 months (recruitment, hardware purchase, implementation). Launching a SOCaaS service (connecting logs, configuring rules) typically takes from 2 to 6 weeks. This is a key difference if you need to meet regulatory requirements quickly.

SecurHub.pl Team
SecurHub.pl expert team specializing in cybersecurity and data protection.

Learn everything about the Security Operations Center (SOC) - from team building, through SIEM/XDR/SOAR technologies, NIS2 requirements, and deployment models, to the future with AI. A practical guide for CISOs and IT managers.
In 2025 the question is "when", not "if" an attack will happen. The board bears personal responsibility up to 600% of salary, NIS2 requires 24/72h reporting, and "pulling the plug" can destroy evidence. Practical guide to building IRP - from CSIRT to Tabletop Exercises.
A 24/7 in-house SOC requires 5-6 analysts per position and costs 5x more than you think. Discover 4 critical mistakes when choosing an MSSP, the MSP vs MSSP difference, the truth about "15-minute response" and why outsourcing doesn't absolve management from NIS2 responsibility.
Loading comments...